Confessions of a Downton Abbey Fan

I admit it: I’m a man…and I like Downton Abbey.

For those who don’t know, it’s the PBS World War I-era period piece miniseries, now in it’s second season.

And I’m not alone: lots of people like it. And here’s why:

It Presents a Living Culture

A living culture is founded upon religion. The Christian religion provides the best basis for culture, but other religions also serve the purpose in varying degrees of quality.

In Downton, though religion is not front-and-center; it’s there in the background almost like an assumption: in the manner of people’s address, in their moral fiber, in the structure of the society and its mores.

Even when the local Anglican vicar gets strong-armed into performing a marriage, the connection is clear that his “living” (read: his parish and income) is dependent upon the great Downton house’s largesse and continued sponsorship.

Morals Matter

Today when someone cohabitates, people shrug. Cohabitation is not different anymore; it’s the (tragic) norm. A sibling’s poor choices in such matters only (externally) seem to affect themselves, not the entire family.

But the opposite is true in the culture of England in Downton’s time (and seen even more explicitly a century prior in the culture during Jane Austen’s Pride and Prejudice). In both those stories, one child’s indiscretion threatens to sink the entire family’s reputation and the fortunes of her sisters. Why? Because the external society more closely reflected the spiritual reality that sin affects the community, the body, the Church, as well as the individual.

So an illicit affair in these cultures had dramatic consequences. What we do matters, and its clear that it does. In our society, the spiritual effect happens due to such sins, but the public consequences no longer reflect it, showing the disconnect between our society and reality.

We’re fascinated by a living culture, one where the invisible connections between us all are outwardly manifested, where our actions matter, where there are sacred things as well as secular. Where there are truly good characters (and truly bad ones, and ones in between), as opposed to the modern skepticism that refuses to admit anyone is truly good (see for example the mangled characterizations of all the men in the Lord of the Rings movies).

What do you think? Have you watched the series? Hate it, love it?

Share
Posted in Entertainment | 4 Comments

First Winners of My Book

Congratulations to Keenan (who commented on the blog post) and Rick R. who tweeted me; they’re the first winners of free copies of my book!

Thank you for everyone who entered. There were fifteen total, so your chances were decent to win this go round. And no worries, as I’ll run another contest next week and give two more away, so if you enter again you’ll probably have another good chance to win. (I never win anything, so this is the kind of contest I like–one where people actually have a good chance.)

Share
Posted in Entertainment | Leave a comment

Catholic Dads on Tap: Creedless Christianity

Brent and I pontificate on Protestant churches that dismiss the need for Creeds, claiming them to be outdated and the “old” way that God worked.

Lightning apologetics round on celibacy for the Kingdom, then a short segment on what to expect from a parish and it’s RCIA program.

Share
Posted in Entertainment, Faith and Reason | Tagged , , | 5 Comments

Win a Free Copy of My Book!

Le Book

I’ve bought some copies of my book to give away, and you can win one!

Here’s the deal: Follow me on twitter and then send out a tweet that includes the book’s name and mentions me, and you are entered to win. Something like:

“I’m entering to win If Protestantism is True by @DevinSRose”

Feel free to just copy and paste that and tweet it out. It’s important to mention me with the @ sign so I get notified of your tweet and can add you to the contest.

I plan to give two books away per week until they’re gone, and may vary the way you enter to win, but to begin with I’d like to try this twitter idea. I’ll give everyone through Wednesday to send out their tweets, for those that check the blog a bit less regularly.

I’ll make a post each week to remind you of what to do to enter. Thanks!

Share
Posted in Faith and Reason | Tagged | 17 Comments

The Creed is Not Passe: Elevation Church Rebutted

Elevation's Pastor keeping it edgy and real

International man of mystery, Doug Beaumont, clued me into this video from Elevation Church‘s “Code Orange Revival”.

The woman giving the sermon, Christine Caine, laudably works to fight human trafficking (something the Catholic Church has worked effectively at for a long time, in spite of the Administration’s removal of funds from the Church’s program). Caine is a leader of Hillsong Church in Australia.

One of her main premises is that churches and people have to be vigilant for how God is moving today (which may be quite different from how He moved yesterday or last year). If a church doesn’t keep up and stay attentive to the Spirit’s current work, they will die.

There is a kernel of truth in what she is saying. But there’s also confusion and error. Just after dismissing churches that still sing songs that were popular five or fifteen years ago–God has moved on from those songs she tells us–Caine says:

We keep going back to our Creeds and our Bureaucracies and our Institutionalized Ways of doing things, but the manna has ceased!

She’s referring to the manna in the desert ending after (about) forty years and how the Israelites had trouble adapting to the new thing God was doing.

Notice how the Nicene and Apostles’ Creeds are equated with “bureaucracy” and “institutionalized ways of doing things.” The takeaway of course is that these are all bad (or at least old) things that God no longer works through.

But of course the Creeds are ageless truths that didn’t stop becoming relevant because Hillsong wrote a few gold-selling songs that topped the CCM charts. This is the “religion vs. relationship” false dichotomy in all its oblivious splendor.

In her zeal to keep up with what (she thinks) God is doing today, she throws out the baby (the Creeds) with the bathwater (rigid man-made bureaucratic institutionalizations).

The only way to keep from going the way of the dodo, we understand, is to “keep up,” “stay relevant,” “anticipate the next move of God and be there.” How long can any church keep that up? Not long. Soon Hillsong and Elevation will get older and less hip and less able to constantly change with what’s popular to the ecclesial consumer (which is easily mistaken for being the same as what God is doing). And they’ll disappear, displaced by newer and more edgy churches.

As John Senior said in The Restoration of Christian Culture:

Through the courts, in think-tanks and research institutes, in activist ideological organizations such as Planned Parenthood, the Humanist Society and the Civil Liberties Union, we have become victims in our public life of a mass agnosticism unknown anywhere in history, and worst of all, this spirit of relativism has paralyzed the Christian churches themselves, whose bewildered and diminishing flocks huddle in the fenceless folds while wolves in shepherd’s clothing explain from the pulpit that the essence of tradition is change.

The alternative is to encounter God in the ever ancient, ever new liturgy that the early Church celebrated, where the Creed is always recited–as true 1,700 years ago as it is today–and just as powerful. God’s Word is read and the Eucharist is confected. The liturgy is not a man-made creation, but the way God has shown that He is to be worshiped in spirit and in truth.

So while God does indeed move in new and unexpected ways in every age, in every year (just look at the growth of Christianity in the Global South, or at the tapestry of saints who uniquely lived their God-given charism in each epoch of history) some things never change, including the truths of the Faith found in the Creed and the liturgy itself.

Share
Posted in Entertainment, Faith and Reason, La Musica | Tagged , | 24 Comments