• Monday, July 23rd, 2007
When Devin and I married last October, I happily changed my name to Catherine Jean Marie Rose, dropping my maiden name. I was proud of my maiden name, Bateson, and all the history that it carried, but I didn’t see any way to carry both names, Rose and Bateson, without seeming like I was resisting my full integration into marriage. Somehow, hyphenating my name, Bateson-Rose, would have made me feel like I was trying to retain some measure of autonomy and individuality even as I entered into the total mutual self-gift that is the sacrament of marriage.
But, recently, I read the biography of St. Gianna Beretta Molla, wife, mother, and doctor. She was so amazing and beautiful! If only I could be a woman like that. Anyway, the author of her biography wrote a lovely reflection about her double surnames, stating,
“Here, one finds the explanation of the dual last name, which is no aristocratic affectation, but rather bears witness to the nobility of a married woman.” (Guerriero, 17)
The nobility of a married woman. I like that!
 And, that certainly has always been Catholic teaching. A woman marries a man sacramentally and joins him as a helpmate, equal in dignity and priceless in value; I know that some Catholic people haven’t always honored women, but the official Church doctrine is clear. Â
That might explain why in “Catholic” countries (countries that have historically been generally Catholic–Italy, France, Latin America) the practice of double surnames is common. Our friends, the Garcias, recently married, and Roxanna took Gerardo’s surname as a complement to her own. I really like that.
Roxanna Garcia Ibarrola. Gianna Beretta Molla. Alexis Thibodeau Dobson. Catherine Bateson Rose. Yep, that’s right. I have officially decided, with the support of Devin, to drop my middle names, Jean Marie, and go with Bateson instead. I’ll miss the lovely Jean Marie, but need to begin exercising the “nobility of a married woman”, right?
 YKC!
Recent Comments