Check out Brent Stubbs’ article at Called to Communion that explains the unexpected similarity between Bart Ehrman and Protestant apologists on the canon.
It comprehensively covers a shorter blog post I made on Ehrman and Protestantism.
Check out Brent Stubbs’ article at Called to Communion that explains the unexpected similarity between Bart Ehrman and Protestant apologists on the canon.
It comprehensively covers a shorter blog post I made on Ehrman and Protestantism.
Interesting post over there.
I left my Lutheran 2 cents at their door.
Devin, thanks for the link. That’s right, you’re the inspiration for a fine and spirited discussion! And it’s such an important articulation of the problem with one argumentative attempt to validate the Protestant canon. To reject certain books on purported historical grounds, they have to call everything into question. I wonder if this is why Calvin didn’t go for a purely objective measure of canon, but instead preached the inner testimony of the Holy Spirit.
Peace in Christ,
Tom B.
Thanks Tom. I’ve often wondered why Calvin and Luther wrote such a relatively little amount about the canon. Perhaps they secretly knew it was a weak link; perhaps they just thought they’d inherit it from the Church and no one would care; perhaps they didn’t realize how much it would explode centuries down the road?
I think Luther had full respect for the canon. But he had a canon within the canon.
Because some books screamed Christ and His gospel, and others…not so much.